Dario Galati: if you look at the moon instead of the finger
Our editorial team has so far followed in a precise and painstaking the parade of prosecution witnesses called to testify by prosecutors. We have heard varied characters, some of them really picturesque, whose credibility will be carefully checked by the Court. The day is June 30 but was called in court a witness who, in our opinion, must be read and considered carefully, not only for the contribution deriving from his professional career but also in relation to its identity as a human and moral point of view.We are talking about Dario Galati, currently employed by the FIGC, and which spoke in the early days of the outbreak of Farce (May 2006) as a possible key witness in support of an accusation that was looking for props from the early days they could keep up the castle mounted in the press. It was immediately named as a person informed to make its contribution, and he pulled back. It was heard by the Carabinieri, the PM, by Judge. All told the truth, a glimpse of life and the Federal Arbitration from 1992 to 2005. A truth, however, not practical for the Court of the horrors of Rupert, far from Moggicentrismo Gazzetta dello Sport, and very oriented to lift the veil on the real contradictions federal organization, the world of arbitration, and football in general. A stage in which Moggi was acting as an actor, like everyone else, adapting to the rhythms of a sick director since 1999 that had set up a redundant plot of conflicts of interest, low blows, envy and suspicion.
E 'therefore interesting to analyze his deposition, often on issues that our staff had already addressed, and are confirmed by the Galatians, along with some "cherry" going to embellish the cake for a game that the suspects now in 2004 and 2005, had started to be really heavy.
Here, then, that
PM questioned by Caputo (which replaces Beatrice) Dario Galati told her story. Dario has 41 years, is FIGC since 1992, initially was not taken regularly, but was paid daily allowances. He began work at the Arbitration Committee, and was a responsible Series C Benedetti, Lombardo-Tedeschi 1 year, 3 years and then from 1998-99 Lanese Pierluigi Pairetto, who chose him as his assistant although he was still in effect a "precarious" .
1999 was the key year. Lega Calcio was working on a project of "professional arbitration." The FIGC welcomed this project, although it was clear that this shift was a true anomaly. The project seemed to go against the AIA, and gave birth to a conflict of interest that undermined the impartiality of the arbitrator. There were several protests by union officials that caused the resignation of a hit Boggs (read the contents of his letter ).
dinner was organized as the famous "Seven Sisters" (Juventus, Inter Milan, Roma, Lazio, Parma and Fiorentina) during which it was decided, at the expense of all other companies, the attitude that was to be given to nascent National Arbitration Committee of A and B.
CAN started from scratch, it did not have the program symphony, the software application that enables automatic calculation AIA all the details of the referees, and then highlight the possible foreclosure and other statistics.
Paolo Bergamo was indicated by the League and its president Franco Carraro, as Manager Designation. However, the President of Roma, Franco Sensi, the candidate considered ALLOY too close "politically" for the club in the north and called for the election of a "double designator" proposed by the FIGC and was a real guarantor.
Nizzola proposed Pairetto which was then coupled to Bergamo. Pairetto came to the ANC, taking with him Dario Galati, who meanwhile had taken care to have employed regularly, and then against it had a debt of gratitude. In addition to the Galatians alla segreteria della CAN arrivarono Maria Grazia Fazi, segretaria di Bergamo e Manfredi Martino che si occupava dei rimborsi spese.
Maria Grazia Fazi, che era in una situazione molto simile a quella di Galati, inquadrata praticamente come commesso, cercava di farsi notare ed era molto ambiziosa, per cui cercava di imporsi a volte anche verso i designatori facendo più di quello che le veniva chiesto.
In ogni caso i designatori consegnarono ai tre collaboratori un documento che era un vero e proprio mansionario, in cui era scritto che la Fazi era delegata a parlare con le società. Da notare che la CAN veniva pagata dalla LEGA, cioè dalle società stesse, autorizzandole inconsciamente a considerarla come una cosa propria.
Galati remained the CAN Secretariat until January 2000, when newspapers reported the story of the famous Rolex given away to the arbitrators by the President of Roma Franco Sensi. A few days before Christmas in Galati was asked to send to the See of Rome's Lazio and home addresses of nominators, referees and linesmen. He refused. She felt something like an invitation to the "gifts" and do not consider it morally acceptable. Someone else did it instead. And, also called over-examination Att. Prioreschi (Moggi defense), makes it clear that Rome gave to the design of the watches Rolex market value of about 25 million lire, the referees Rolex watches from 5 million pounds and assistants cheapest Rolex watches not worth a few million dollars. He tells his bitterness, as they usually spent on gifts to officials and secretaries were distributed under the eyes of everyone, while never reaching that market value. Urged by the PM
recalls other incidents of his stay at that office. In particular, referring to the fact that there were several companies who were accustomed to call, some of which even so insistent, and remember how to Serie C this contact was unusual and usually entrusted to paper.
Also in the examination of the PM, Galati has confirmed its attendance at meetings of CAN, Bergamo, Pairetto, niche (current President of AIA ed), Celli, Drive and Fazi. Explain in detail that his job was to manage the software, and report the cases to Pairetto replays to show to arbitration meetings.
Fazi had no confirmation that the specific tasks within the office and merely supervise the work. It emphasizes that the grids were prepared by the Design, which took care to provide only the results of the software. It reiterates that, together with the notes prepared Fazi and balls to make the draw and that due to a mistake on their foreclosures designators got into the habit of verifying that the secretariat had prepared. Remember that during the season 98/99, the first days of the draw was made with plastic pellets particularly bad, so then came those of metal coated, bayonet use that is marked, a circumstance that sometimes made them recognizable. At this point a very interesting intervention, during-examination of Galatians, Att. Morescanti (defense Fabiani), which underlined the fragility of the metal balls, which apparently suffered to draw any further damage caused by mixing in the urn, which is why the recognition was completely outside the empirical. How special episodes
Galatians tells what happened at the beginning of the season 99-00. Sensi was struggling with its ghosts and, in the middle of power struggle, the second day there was a Roma-Inter that was given to the referee Domenico Messina. During the game the Rome feels abused and gave birth to the usual arguments (note that the favorite team at that time was the Inter ....)
the fifth round was reinserted into the grid for the Messina-Roma and Fiorentina Galati pains to point out that it seemed inappropriate, but was not heard even from the same Pairetto instead told him that "he lists" without further comment.
Other small anomaly that tells the Galatians is the draw for arbitration before the second class, which avveniva nella sede della CAN a cura degli impiegati della segreteria. In alcuni casi Galati segnala che i designatori gli chiesero di non farlo e di dire che l’arbitro sorteggiato fosse quello indicato da loro. Galati ricorda almeno tre episodi in cui ciò avvenne, ma precisa che le spiegazioni che gli furono date erano più che plausibili soprattutto in relazione a fatto che gli arbitri e le società interessate erano comunque sempre diverse.
Un importante episodio di conflitto di interessi fu il momento della nomina del rimpiazzo di Boggi come arbitro internazionale. Solitamente ciò avveniva su segnalazione da parte del Presidente dell’AIA al Presidente della FIGC che provvedeva alla nomina. I due designatori ritenevano però che la scelta fosse esclusivamente tecnica e su questa base proposero Tombolini, che si contrappose al candidato AIA appoggiato da Gonella, che era Farina. Non riuscendo a trovare un accordo rimisero la scelta al Presidente Federale, non prima di aver aggiunto un terzo candidato, De Santis, e aver commissionato uno studio tecnico quantitativo sul rendimento degli arbitri che fu preparato dallo stesso Galati, che però lo considerava poco significativo in quanto basato semplicemente su dati statistici e privo di altre importanti informazioni di tipo caratteriale e culturale. A spuntarla in quel caso fu Massimo De Santis (e probabilmente dei tre era davvero il migliore tecnicamente, visti i disastri che gli altri due hanno combinato negli anni successivi).
Galati CAN then worked at the Secretariat for just over six months from July 1999 to January 2000. Then, being on good terms with Virginio Quartuccio asked to go to work at the AIA office, and following the youth school where he met Innocenzo Mazzini, who, when he was elected vice president of the FIGC in December 2001, and proposed to follow him at his office, for He served until May 2005.
Among the salient episodes of his years as Vice-President Federal Galati Mazzini recalls a phone call in which the federal vice-president confided that Spruce had made the checks between the salaries of employees and transfers actually granted, finding many discrepancies. The circumstances would have suggested the existence of sections of the budget at the FIGC false, but this story was never heard anything. (Editor's note despite a mysterious parliamentary interpellation made by Senator Gigi Malabarba, a member of the Parliamentary Control Committee on Intelligence on March 7, 2006 Session No. 4-10255 act. 964 XV of the Legislature. The senator in question in Parliament demanded an explanation about the ' origin of certain transfers of a few thousand euro, which were traced to the accounts of some employees of the FIGC.)
Galati also points out that Mazzini had reports, and telephone, with all the presidents of companies, as part of its institutional role Federal Vice President.
In May 2005 he left the voice of the Galatians Innocenzo Mazzini largely because she felt exploited and not rewarded, as it felt to have a degree too low compared to the actual responsibilities that were entrusted to it by the letter of assignment specifications. His
became a real ordeal, it sparked a dispute with the FIGC and his story took on the contours of bullying, especially because due to serious health reasons was forced to remain for long weeks of illness. In November 2005 he returned to work in March 2006 and was transferred to the CAF, the federal appeals court in those days in the thick of the case Genoa.
the CAF Galati had major assignments, but soon saw the serious shortcomings in the procedures of protocol documents, so she wisely not to affix his initials on documents handled. He denounced this weakness but in fact, being already in full mobbing, was marginalized and then covertly accused of the disappearance of certain documents.
In particular there was an episode in which a document on the story disappeared Boudianski-Zetulayev, (the players had been licensed by Reggina Juventus but they were, and it had appealed, winning it on the basis of a conflict between a norm of the state structure and a sporting rule). The mystery is explained by the lawyer. Prioreschi over-examination: the document was not unlawfully removed from the archives, but was sent to Rome prosecutors in the process GEA.
Up to this point the Galatians witness statements are very interesting. But even become explosive atmosphere in the made-examination by the lawyer. Prioreschi that skillfully brings out some important circumstances.
The first concerns the Republic of journalist Corrado Zunino.
Galati confirms that called him the second day after the release of interceptions, 4 May 2006, while there was still the confidentiality of investigations on the material that was circulated. Zunino called him and told him to meet and want to know his story, Galati accepted because he hoped to address his question to work, to explain his concept of addiction as a public service, talking about the first time a union had entered into a federation privatized. The reporter promised to do an article about his harassment and the rights of workers, and that would never have used his case, but immediately disappointed his expectations and after some time in October 2006, the call in the evening Republic of Sport at the headquarters in Rome, asking him to help him about Calciopoli transcribed interceptions, which were in possession of some Zunino CD containing all final-examination of files.Il Prioreschi is explosive. Moggi's lawyer asks if he knows Galati Alessandro Lulli, a former lineman, who worked for the FIGC, Italy Club officer for relations with international referees. Galati nods and talks about an incident that had underestimated the time, but in light of what happened during these years is really disturbing.
Lulli confided to him that in April 2005 he went to do the tour of the referee for the match v Inter Milan Champions League and said that the trio had not been happy with the treatment received by the host society (AC Milan); Then began a strange speech that he had spoken with a manager of Inter, probably identified in the figure of Rinaldo Ghelfi, and they told him they had commissioned a private investigation to a survey / dossier against the referee, giving even the cost of about € 500 000. Investigation, however, illegal and therefore unusable. It remains to understand what were the findings of this survey.
(Some time ago Moratti confirmed that there had been a survey or something, but specifying that the results were negative. Without this consideration, there are three possible hypotheses. The first is that the dossier is the same Ghelfi file, and then confirmed by Moratti is unusable because it contains nothing. The second is that the file is different from that of Ghelfi Moratti confirmed. The third is that the dossier contained Moratti confirmed with something interesting but Moratti has lied, so that someone asked him on behalf of the illegally acquired information).
Among those listening to the testimony so far we Galati one of the richest and most suitable to fully understand the reality of the case Calciopoli. The astute reader will have noticed that Dario Galati never names Luciano Moggi, and certainly not because it is his court-appointed lawyer. Not appointing him because his analysis focuses on the conflict of interest, internal contradictions FIGC, the power struggles, weak points in the federal system and the League. All
stuff that is not "popular sentiment" and that serves to eliminate enemies uncomfortable and unfortunately very good.
In the best tradition, while everyone looks at the finger, Dario Galati look at the moon, and clearly helps us to understand.
Source: www.ju29ro.com
0 comments:
Post a Comment