Il mio nome è Bond, Danilo Bond
so we could feel protected at least once, and you, with a look of sweet and severe,
replied to me that this thing could not ask, you were not capable.
great.
He was not able to Thy great dignity, he was not able your natural honesty, sportsmanship
intact from the first day that you joined Inter
Nucini Danilo, a former whistle Bergamo active in Series A and B in the second half of the '90s to the 2004-05 season, appeared in court the day before yesterday (May 26) to recount the ostracism by the entire world to him confidential arbitration, so as to deprive him of the possibilities for advancement to high levels. It has been repeatedly called a free spirit, a man without a master, but the story told has many flaws, and tell it committed numerous inaccuracies and contradictions, reacting with arrogance and irritation to those who pointed out him.
Many species did the story of his assiduous, and was an arbitrator in business, with a maximum of Inter manager, the late Giacinto Facchetti, which he described as a constant point of reference to whom he turned to take comfort from his career problems.
Not to mention the numerous inaccuracies and oddities that dot the history of encounters with Fabiani and Moggi and Italian with the matter of SIM on non-complaint. But let's order.
ostracism WORLD ARBITRATION
Nucini accuses the National Arbitration Committee has always operated with logic patronage careers without merit, repeatedly declaring himself a victim of the system.
mean admitting that they had problems with all the commissioners who succeeded to the leadership of the ANC, without exception, by Casarin, a Baldas / Mattei, Pairetto and Bergamo. Nucini says candidly that he had a fight with everyone. Moreover, he admits that he never even tied with colleagues, he has always kept in isolation from others. According to him, the problem was not him but the fact remains that anyone around him was not good. In short, the classic troublemaker. Except for the first year, the ANC commissioner, time of emergency that led to the cooptation of many referees from the lower leagues, allowing access to the highest level, refereeing in Serie A and B, a goal that otherwise could hardly be achieved. To try to
give substance to his allegations against the world of arbitration, the journalist mentions the old story of Thomas Tuttosport, that in the infamous 1997-98 season, according to a survey by the competing (!) Journal, was accused of having inappropriate relationships with some referees , which, however, when subjected to disciplinary proceedings, were acquitted. This will not be the only time Nucini use arguments related not so much facts, but to press campaigns and views close to the Inter reasons (the deal By Thomas broke out at the notorious controversy over Ronaldo's penalty and subsequent whining ).
BOLOGNA JUVENTUS 1-0 of 14/01/2001
Nucini tells of being ostracized by designators Bergamo and Pairetto after having conceded a penalty against Juventus in the domestic match against Bologna on January 14, 2001. He attributes the incident to a suspension of 40 days he suffered. But then he admits that he also responded poorly to Pairetto which, at the next weekly meeting in Coverciano, had pointed out the error. But there was the penalty? Before talking about an interview in which, according to a story his wife's telephone immediately following the match, Iuliano, the author of the phallus, to prove him right, he is forced to admit that they have suffered all unanimous criticism from the press, and not only for the penalty, an arbitrage disaster, For all of them. I invite the reader to read
The article in the Corriere on that game, since eloquent subtitle: "The referee Nucini the worst in the field." But read it all worth it. Reporters and Padovan Franchetti devote two thirds of the space they have available to comment of referee mistakes, most unique setting, such as to obscure the performance of the players. For another, its direction is defined as blatantly pro-Juve until a few minutes from the end (it has the reputation of being a referee home), when the referee awards a penalty much doubt Bologna, in a 1-0 (penalty wrong then da Cruz ).
We are confident that the designs criticized him only for that penalty? Indeed, the witness said he resisted the invitation to Bergamo to apologize for the reaction to Pairetto Coverciano. So Nucini arbitrated evil and wrong answer to the findings of the designs. What's more, laments the lack of solidarity among colleagues, in his view too competitive with new entries.
He is asked if the leaders Juventus after the match went to protest, but the answer is no. To give a semblance of substance to his "feelings", is attached to a post-game gadgets, those who always give the host club to the arbitrators and, in the case of Juve, consisted of a shirt and a backpack containing the videotape the match: in that case, Nucini he found a black and white jacket with a black square instead of the name of the player. In practice, describes the episode as it was a retaliatory thriller, lacking only the blood.
So, from that race, from that penalty against Juventus, according to him would have ostracized. Worse, the following year led him to arbitrate only Serie B. True? No, false. Just check: Lecce - Parma, 18th day, January 14, 2002, and Verona - Fiorentina, 25th day, March 3, 2002 (and other 3 in 2002-03). In fact refereed matches in Serie A until the last years of his career, 2004-05, for example, when he directed a highly contested Fiorentina - Messina.
Insomma, su questo il teste mente.
Non solo, sempre nel 2000-01, dopo quel Juve-Bologna diresse altre 4 gare di serie A, di cui una della Juve stessa (Juve-Reggina, vittoria della Juve) e, quando gli avvocati difensori glielo fanno notare, si rifugia nell'evocazione di una fantomatica strategia dei designatori per dismetterlo senza destare sospetti. Delirante.
Ma quale fu la prima partita di A che diresse dopo quel Juve-Bologna?
INTER – UDINESE 2-1 del 25/02/01
Questo è il vero momento chiave, molto più del rigore dato contro la Juve. Infatti, in seguito a una mancata ammonizione all’interista Di Biagio, Nucini viene redarguito negli spogliatoi dal commissario arbitrale, e poi telefonicamente da Bergamo. Come negli altri casi, l’arbitro non accetta la critica, ribatte a muso duro al commissario, e Facchetti, che assiste alla scena, il giorno dopo lo chiama.
Un dirigente interista che telefona a un arbitro, per altro dopo un errore arbitrale in suo favore. Gli avvocati vanno a nozze: “ E’ normale questo? Era consentito dal regolamento? ” No, ammette, ma Bergamo è una città piccola e la conoscenza con Facchetti risaliva già al '98, no, al '99, no, al '97. Ci si incontrava, si beveva un caffè (come Baldini e Auricchio a Roma?). Gli chiedono perché non ha segnalato all’Ufficio Indagini la telefonata del dirigente interista, particularly since the witness had previously said he had reported the presence of the designated locker room after a Moggi in Naples and Ancona arbitration by him (who had simply, and politely greeted, he admits), and that his "complaint" had below; " eh, but the call depends on the content "; " eh, but Moggi was to stay in Naples." The Government pointed out that the top had complained of the behavior of referees accused (then acquitted) of having attended a journalist, who preaches well and scratching so bad. E 'forced to agree.
Then the dossier. Former referee about a dossier , compiled by him, errors arbitration pro-Juve (direct and indirect) on the season May 5, 2001-2002, and how designators, in his view, assess them in juve-optic wire. The idea would be born with indignation to a penalty conceded by a Bolognino Juventus-Chievo 15 September 2001. The document is on the file. In the file there is a Parma-Juve, in which the text to say there was a penalty not given to landlords by Racalbuto; operative legal Racalbuto that points out that in reality the game was won by Parma and that Juve claim for failure to eject Almeyda. Response. " I wrote what interested me . The Advocate va oltre: " Sa qual è la sospensione più lunga comminata a un arbitro? 8 mesi, che vennero inflitti a Racalbuto per un rigore dubbio concesso alla Juve contro la Roma ". Nucini abbozza.
Gli si chiede se con Facchetti si cominciarono a vedere dopo quell’episodio, ma lui ammette che si frequentavano già prima, al bar, anche nell’ufficio di Facchetti a Bergamo, dove faceva l’assicuratore. Parlavano di “impressioni verbali, sensazioni, episodi e poi l'elenco delle partite ”. Con che frequenza si vedevano? Frequentemente, anche settimanalmente.
Poi la questione Fabiani, e il racconto di Nucini si trasforma in una spy-story.
IL MIO NOME E' BOND, BOND DANILO
was Facchetti, according to the account of the former referee, who had the idea. Nucini, after the "tragic" May 5, he presented the dossier to his friend on Juve, he said hardly convincing (in fact Inter had ever complain before then ...) the alleged rotten in football (during-examination of defendants , the witness admitted repeatedly that it was only his "feelings" are not substantiated by evidence). Facchetti would have advised him to become a "friend" of the arbitrators, in particular, De Santis (Dossier Telecom). And a Christmas dinner (2002?), Would then increasingly Facchetti said: " information about who is Fabiani "(singular: he, too dossier Telecom).
During a dinner, so he asked Nucini colleagues who this Fabiani, acknowledging jitter (?) By Racalbuto. The next day, De Santis, under the pretext of a tear on the car of Nucini to the training ground at Linate airport, asked him why he was interested in the subject, confiding to know him was to be his colleague at a juvenile prison, before scolding him again for the penalty given against Juve now more than a year ago (remember the article in the Corriere Nucini the worst in the field "!).
Later, after a Cosenza - Triestina (including Fabiani was DS) arbitrated by the March 16, 2003 Nucini same, the airport would take place the first meeting, during which the DS would give him his phone number. Fabian's lawyer, in-examination, challenged the presence of his client at the airport that day, producing travel documents prepared for the trip from Trieste, which did not provide the return flight for him. Moreover, in the pm about a Nucini Fabiani that promises to get him a good rating by the commissioner of arbitration, but the Advocate-examination reverses, in reality this was only a brief, friendly greeting.
After that, it would have been called by Nucini Fabiani that would bar called the Crystal Hotel in Bergamo, dove l’avrebbe rassicurato che ci avrebbe pensato lui a fargli tornare ad arbitrare la serie A. Tramite "il suo uomo". Peccato che, come già detto, nel 2002-03 Nucini la serie A l'aveva già fatta: Piacenza – Empoli del 26 ottobre 2002, Piacenza – Como del 2 marzo 2003 (quindi solo 14 giorni prima della partita di Cosenza) e Como – Perugia del 12 aprile.
L’"uomo di Fabiani", ovviamente, sarebbe Moggi, che in quell’occasione sarebbe stato contattato al cellulare, per farlo parlare direttamente con Nucini. Davanti al pm, il teste rievoca un ambiguo invito di Moggi: “ Fai quello che dice lui ” (ma poi al controesame, al solito, parzialmente ritratta, parlando of a simple exchange of courtesy phrases), and a show of Fabiani, once closed the call with Moggi, he would have bragged of being able to appoint the arbitrators. So the prosecutor asked him what happened after that meeting, and the witness replied that he actually went to finally make a lot of A. Too bad that in the classroom just mention that Piacenza - Como, a race that had taken place two weeks before Cosenza - Triestina, and well before the first meeting at the bar . You arrive at the 2003-2004 season. Nucini is expected to start from A, but send him to B in Palermo - Cagliari. His leadership is challenged by the observer Ingargiola, but Fabiani, he said, he would have called to reassure him: " Do not worry, do not you mess, I'll . The test performed at Coverciano no trouble, but is punished anyway: then Fabiani is a Cazzaro? And why did not designate the A?
At that point, finally, Fabiani it was decided to submit to "her man". Appointment to Gregg, the Milan-Turin, where he was loaded into the machine heads, visiting a village to make a cash and buy a phone charger from a tobacconist (bizarre and confused the story). Then back to their cars at this point would have led to Turin Fabiani, Concord Hotel, where a room would follow them Moggi himself, after the pleasantries would have made a couple of calls to both demonstration designators, treating them badly, making the case for Nucini and inviting them to enhance it (and incidentally, almanacs in hand, the only league where Nucini not miss a game refereed by A was exactly what : the face of the dome moggiana!) also would have ordered not to designate a Pairetto Dondarini for Juve. And where Donda went on to do damage that Sunday, according to the witness? Of course, in Udine, to punish the entire, the greatest victim of abuse moggiani (and incidentally, chronicles the hand, in the range of that game - the way: the range?! - The friend of Inter Nucini became the star of a visit protest in the dressing room of the arbitrators, as the "official", the Corriere was defined as "inappropriate"). Moggi
When vanishes, Fabiani was awarded to Nucini an Italian SIM.
So, not foreign? No, Italian. Bah.
exhilarating, finally, the reconstruction of the instructions that would have given Fabiani: "I explained that cells divide cells here ... ... ... cells there." Maybe he meant "cells", however it is a masterpiece of nonsense.
NEVER USED THE SIM, rather it '; never reported, rather it', indeed, NO, I DO NOT WANT TO SAY
Therefore, the sim Fabiani. Italian. Here everything is even more confused and grotesque.
Nucini Facchetti said he immediately called on the highway, returning from the meeting at the Hotel Concord, to tell the Sim. Some time later, at the home of Facchetti, would have then made a more detailed account. " Here is the problem " would have concluded the two. We should now be towards the end of 2003, and it is interesting to see when, according to some press reports in 2006, began the activities of the Inter Tavaroli, because there are curious inconsistencies (like the famous "dossier Thieves" is in fact already a year before). But
Sim? Nucini used it? No. Actually, yes. Maybe a couple times. The witness continues to contradict itself. Moreover, as they then see lawyers, had told investigators that he marked the number (press only Facchetti) and that he had thrown away. No, now I remember better, not right away, before there were a couple of calls Fabiani. But Nucini
Facchetti and decided not to press charges? At that point they would hand in a nice bomb: the sim. Someone should send him to the nearest whole Boccassini, the Milan prosecutors. He goes there, but the sim had already thrown. Why? Could not keep and to enable the magistrate to catch that number? But then he said the public prosecutor in Milan? Mystery. Nucini not want to talk about it. " talked about football. " In short, a "here you study stage" with a dash of "a day in district court." And the office's investigation
Figc? He was there on purpose. But no, he Nucini, the man without a bridle, he did not trust anyone.
None of them. Indeed, one of you: "I told Giacinto Facchetti, it was the only the only one who could remove everything! If I had addressed inquiries to the office, to anyone, no one would listen, but I would be thrown out! .
They ask if it is true, as reported by some newspapers, that she wanted to work for Inter, maybe make the referees involved. Nucini first vehemently denies any ipotesi di tal genere, poi deve ammettere che Facchetti gli aveva offerto un posto di lavoro . Tiene a specificare che lui avrebbe rifiutato sdegnoso.
Gli avvocati lo incalzano: “ Negli incontri con Moggi e Fabiani, non le è venuto in mente di portare un registratore?" . Risposta. “ Il registratore non è elegante. E poi non faccio l’investigatore .”
E per finire questo prolisso resoconto, una piccola chicca: infervorato, sotto i colpi del controesame dei legali che gli contestano le discrepanze tra la testimonianza resa in aula e quelle rese nel 2006 e 2007 agli inquirenti, Danilo Bond si lascia andare: “Sa cos'è? Per venire qua mi sono letto a file of 250 pages that I checked in and then I had not done! .
Lawyers speak out: "Ah yes ? And where did he get this information? And when he collected? He had it in 2007 by the Police, then? Before coming here in recent days has spoken to anyone about this process? He consulted with anyone? .
A lawyer observes strange textual similarities between two of his previous statements to investigators, as if the second was the result of the first copiaincolla. The judge tries to calm tempers. Danilo Bond does not accept any insinuations about "prompters" in 'shadow
" No, no, no I am interested in anyone, do not worry, a lawyer! I never had any master, lawyer . Maybe.
Source: www.ju29ro.com
0 comments:
Post a Comment